Impact of a Bt-based bioinsecticide on the predatory capacity of Ceraeochrysa cincta (Schneider, 1851) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37486/2675-1305.ec08014

Keywords:

green lacewing, biological control, fall armyworm, functional response

Abstract

Green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) are predatory insects during their larval stages, feeding on a variety of insect pests including psyllids, miner bugs, whiteflies, mealybugs, and the eggs and larvae of lepidopterans. These predators are integral to various agricultural systems. Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), commonly known as the fall armyworm, is a significant corn pest in Brazil and damages other crops like soybeans, cotton, and tomatoes. To control this pest, strategies such as Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner, 1915 (Bt)-based bioinsecticides and Bt transgenic plants are used. However, the rapid development of resistance hinders control, making the integration of different management tactics essential. This study examines the impact of the Bt-based bioinsecticide on the predatory behavior of the first, second, and third larval instars of Ceraeochrysa cincta (Schneider, 1851) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) through functional response analyses, using neonate S. frugiperda larvae as prey. Distinct functional responses were observed among larval instars. First-instar larvae exhibited a Type III response in both control and Bt-based bioinsecticide (Crystal®) treatments. In contrast, second- and third-instar larvae showed a Type I response in the control and a Type III response under bioinsecticide exposure. The highest attack rates occurred in first- and third-instar larvae in the control treatment, while handling time did not differ among instars or treatments. In conclusion, although the Bt-based bioinsecticide altered the functional response pattern of second- and third-instar larvae, it did not compromise the overall predatory capacity of C. cincta, supporting its compatibility with integrated pest management programs against S. frugiperda.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ail-Catzim, C. E.; Rodríguez-González, R. E.; Hernández-Juárez, A.; Chacón-Hernández, J. C. (2019) Functional response of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on Myzus persicae nymphs (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 121(4): 535-543. doi: 10.4289/0013-8797.121.4.535

Aljetlawi, A. A.; Sparrevik, E.; Leonardsson, K. (2004) Prey–predator size‐dependent functional response: derivation and rescaling to the real world. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73(2): 239–252. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00800.x

Alves, S. B.; Lopes, R. B.; Pereira, R. M. (2011) Controle biológico de pragas e doenças: conceitos, história e perspectivas. Revista de Agricultura Neotropical, 48: 1-10.

Boaventura, D.; Martin, M.; Pozzebon, A.; Mota-Sanchez, D.; Nauen, R. (2020) Monitoring of target-site mutations conferring insecticide resistance in Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects, 11(8): 585. doi: 10.3390/insects11080545

Carvalho, R. A.; Omoto, C.; Field, L. M.; Williamson, M. S.; Bass, C. (2013) Investigating the molecular mechanisms of organophosphate and pyrethroid resistance in the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. PLoS One, 8 (4): e62268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062268

Desneux, N.; Decourtye, A.; Delpuech, J. M. (2007) The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 52: 81–106. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440

Di Stefano, J.; Fidler, F.; Cumming, G. (2005) Effect size estimates and confidence intervals: an alternative focus for the presentation and interpretation of ecological data, pp. 71-102. In: Burk, A. R. (Ed.), New Trends in Ecology Research. Nova Science, New York.

Diez-Rodríguez, G. I.; Omoto, C. (2001) Herança da resistência de Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) a lambda-cialotrina. Neotropical Entomology, 30(2): 311-316. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2001000200016

Domínguez-Arrizabalaga, M.; Villanueva, M.; Escriche, B.; Ancín-Azpilicueta, C.; Caballero, P. (2020) Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis proteins against Coleopteran pests. Toxins, 12(7): 430. 10.3390/toxins12070430

Figueiredo, M. L. C.; Penteado-Dias, A. M.; Cruz, I. (2005) Danos provocados por Spodoptera frugiperda na produção de matéria seca e nos rendimentos de grãos, na cultura do milho. Comunicado Técnico, nº 130. Sete Lagoas: Embrapa/CNPMS.

Freitas, S. (2001) Criação de crisopídeos (bicho lixeiro) em laboratório. Jaboticabal: Funep.

Griswold, M. W.; Lounibos, L. P. (2006) Predator identity and additive effects in a treehole community. Ecology, 87(4): 987–995. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[987:piaaei]2.0.co;2

Holling, C. S. (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. The Canadian Entomologist, 91(7): 385-398. doi: 10.4039/ent91385-7

Jeschke, J. M.; Kopp, M.; Tollrian, R. (2002) Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecological Monographs, 72(1): 95–112. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0095:pfrdbh]2.0.co;2

Juliano, S. A. (2001) Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. In: Scheiner, S. M.; Gurevitch, J. (Eds), Design and analysis of ecological experiments, pp. 178–196. Chapman and Hall/CRC. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195131871.003.0010

Kenis, M.; Benelli, G.; Biondi, A.; Calatayud, P. A.; Day, R.; Desneux, N.; Harrison, R. D.; Kriticos, D.; Rwomushana, I.; den Berg, J., et al (2022) Invasiveness, biology, ecology, and management of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Entomologia Generalis, 43(2): 187-241. doi: 10.1127/entomologia/2022/1659

Koutsoula, G.; Stamkopoulou, A.; Pekas, A.; Wäckers, F.; Broufas, G.; Pappas, M. L. (2023) Predation efficiency of the green lacewings Chrysoperla agilis and C. mutata against aphids and mealybugs in sweet pepper. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 113(2): 162-168. doi: 10.1017/s0007485322000426

Lawo, N. C.; Romeis, J. (2008) Assessing the utilization of a carbohydrate food source and the impact of insecticidal proteins on larvae of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea. Biological Control, 44(1): 389–398. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.12.002

Niño, A. A.; Cave, R. D. (2023) Prey preference of Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) between immature stages of Microtheca ochroloma (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Florida Entomologist, 105(4): 275-279. doi: 10.1653/024.105.0402

Nunes, G. S.; Nascimento, I. N.; Souza, G. M. M.; Oliveira, R.; Oliveira, F. Q.; Luna Batista, J. (2017) Biological aspects and predation behavior of Ceraeochrysa cubana against Spodoptera frugiperda. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 12(1):20-25. doi: 10.5039/agraria.v12i1a5411

Okuma, D. M.; Bernardi, D.; Horikoshi, R. J.; Bernardi, O.; Silva, A. P.; Omoto, C. (2018) Inheritance and fitness costs of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance to spinosad in Brazil. Pest Management Science, 74(6): 1441-1448. doi: 10.1002/ps.4829

Omoto, C.; Bernardi, O.; Salmeron, E.; Sorgatto, R. J.; Dourado, P. M.; Crivellari, A.; Carvalho, R. A.; Willse, A.; Martinelli, S.; Head, G. P. (2016) Field-evolved resistance to Cry1Ab maize by Spodoptera frugiperda in Brazil. Pest Management Science, 72(9): 1727–1736. doi: 10.1002/ps.4201

Pimenta, I. C. O.; Nunes, G. S.; Magalhães, G. O.; Santos, N. A.; Pinto, M. M. D.; De Bortoli, S. A. (2020) Effects of a Bt-based insecticide on the functional response of Ceraeochrysa cincta preying on Plutella xylostella. Ecotoxicology, 29(7): 856–865. doi: 10.1007/s10646-020-02244-x

Rogers, D. (1972) Random search and insect population models. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 41(2): 369–383.doi: 10.2307/3474

SAS Institute (2023) Inc. SAS On Demand for Academics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Disponível em: https://www.sas.com/pt_br/software/on-demand-for-academics.html. Access on: iii.2024.

Sedaratian-Jahromi, A. (2021) Effects of Entomopathogens on Insect Predators and Parasitoids. In: Khan, M.A., Ahmad, W. (Eds.), Microbes for Sustainable lnsect Pest Management. Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection, vol 17., pp 183–231. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-67231-7_9

Silva, L. B.; Maggioni, K.; Ferreira, R. H.; Silva, A. F.; Pavan, B. E.; Lopes, G. N. (2019) Survival and nutritional indexes of Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) maintained in Bt maize for five generations. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 14(2): 1-8. doi: 10.5039/agraria.v14i2a5629

Stenberg, J. A.; Sundh, I.; Becher, P. G.; Björkman, C.; Dubey, M.; Egan, P. A.; Friberg, H.; Gil, J. F.; Jensen, D. F.; Jonsson, M. (2021) When is it biological control? A framework of definitions, mechanisms, and classifications. Journal of Pest Science, 94(3): 665–676. doi: 10.1007/s10340-021-01354-7

Symondson, W. O. C.; Sunderland, K. D.; Greenstone, M. H. (2002) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annual Review of Entomology, 47: 561–594. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145240

Vachon, V.; Laprade, R.; Schwartz, J. L. (2012) Current models of the mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal proteins: a critical review. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 111(1): 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2012.05.001

Zanuncio, J. C.; Silva, C. A. D. D.; Lima, E. R. D.; Pereira, F. F.; Ramalho, F. D. S.; Serrão, J. E. (2008) Predation rate of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae with and without defense by Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 51(1): 121-125. doi: 10.1590/s1516-89132008000100015

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Silva, S. C. da, Pacheco, D. da R., Pimenta, I. C. de O., Ramalho, D. G., & De Bortoli, S. A. (2026). Impact of a Bt-based bioinsecticide on the predatory capacity of Ceraeochrysa cincta (Schneider, 1851) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomological Communications, 8, ec08014. https://doi.org/10.37486/2675-1305.ec08014

Issue

Section

Protocol & Techniques

Metrics

Funding data

Most read articles by the same author(s)